JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 13, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Aquiles Arrieta Gómez

✓Claimant Reinel Muñoz Zuñiga

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Cumplimiento De Sentencia De Tutela E Incidente De Desacato
  • Competencia excepcional de la Corte Constitucional
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Seguimiento al cumplimiento de la Sentencia SU.446/11.

Con el presente auto se ordena a la Oficina Jurídica de la Fiscalía General de la Nación informar a la Corporación el estado de la evaluación de la situación laboral del señor Reinel Muñoz Zúñiga, al igual que presentar un informe sobre el avance del cumplimiento del numeral noveno de la precitada providencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. ORDENAR a la Oficina Jurídica de la Fiscalía General de la Nación que dentro de los cinco (05) días siguientes a la notificación de este auto informe el estado de la evaluación de la situación laboral del señor Reinel Muñoz Zúñiga.
  2. SEGUNDO. ORDENAR a la Oficina Jurídica de la Fiscalía General de la Nación que en los treinta (30) días siguientes a la notificación del presente auto presente un informe sobre el avance del cumplimiento del numeral
  3. noveno. de la Sentencia SU - 446 de 2011.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.